(EDIT: These solutions earned me a slot in N1, top 16.)
I solved eight problems on the Putnam last Saturday. Here were the solutions I found during the exam, plus my repaired solution to B3 (the solution to B3 I submitted originally had a mistake).
Some comments about the test. I thought that the A test was mostly very easy: problems A1, A3, A4 were all routine, and problem A5 is a little long-winded but nothing magical. Problem A2 was tricky, and took me well over half the A session. I don’t know anything about A6, but it seems to be very hard.
The B session, on the other hand, was completely bizarre. In my opinion, the difficulty of the problems I did attempt was
1. Problems
1.1. Day A
- 1.}
- Points
and
are on the same branch of the hyperbola
. Point
is selected between them maximizing the area of
. Show that the area of region bounded by the hyperbola and
equals the area of region bounded by the hyperbola and
.
- Define
,
and
. Find an odd prime dividing
.
- Compute
- Let
where
. Compute
.
- Let
be an odd integer and define
Prove
is odd if and only if
for some prime
.
- Let
,
,
,
be
real matrices. Prove that if
and
,
have the same characteristic polynomial then
.
1.2. Night B
- Let
be thrice differentiable. Prove that if
has at least five distinct roots then
has at least two distinct roots.
- Starting with the list of positive integers
, we repeatedly remove the first three elements as well as their sum, giving a sequence of sums
,
,
,
,
, and so on. Decide whether some sum in the sequence ends with
in base
.
- Define
to be the set of real matrices
such that
,
,
,
form an arithmetic progression in that order. Find all
such that for some integer
,
.
- Let
. Prove that
is rational and determine its value.
- Let
be the number of permutations
such that
where
. For any
show that
does not depend on
and determine its value.
- Let
be the number of odd divisors of
in the interval
. Compute
2. Solution to Problem A1
Standard A1 fare. WLOG is to the left of
on the positive branch. First we claim the tangent to
must be parallel to line
; otherwise let it intersect the parabola again at
, and any point between
and
will increase the area of
. In that case, we must have
Now the area bounded by is
The area of is computed similarly and gives
and so these are equal.
3. Solution to Problem A2
By induction we have . Thus
for any
,
, because their quotient is both rational and an algebraic integer. Thus
.
During the test, I only found this solution by computing , \dots,
explicitly and factoring the first
numbers, upon which I realized
.
4. Solution to Problem A3
First, we use the fact that for any odd integer , we have
where is an
th root of unity. (Just plug
into
.) Thus
5. Solution to Problem A4
We first prove that for every
. It suffices to consider
since otherwise
. We note that for any
, if
and
then we require that
for some
; since
this implies
.
Thus among any three consecutive numbers, at least one is in . Plainly
and hence
.
Finally note that
so the answer is .
6. Solution to Problem A5
Let . By Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion (or Moebius inversion?) we have
The vanishes when taking modulo
. Now,
depends only on the input modulo
, equalling
for
and
for
. As
the exponents in the floor also can be taken mod
. Therefore, we can simplify this to
Let . The solution now proceeds in three cases.
If any prime is or
mod
, say
, then
for
and thus
is even.
If all primes are or
mod
and
, then
and
for
and thus
is even.
But if and
then
is always odd. This completes the proof.
7. Solution to Problem B1
Let . The problem asks to show
having five distinct real roots implies
has at least two. But by Rolle’s Theorem on
we see that having
roots gives
having
roots, so done. (I’m told the trick of considering this function
is not new, though I came up with it during the exam so I can’t verify this.)
Lots of people said something about trying to use the Intermediate Value Theorem to show that has a root between any two roots of
. This would require
to be continuously differentiable, so it breaks down at the last application to
. I deliberately appealed to Rolle’s Theorem because I didn’t trust myself to deal with these real-analytic issues during the exam.
8. Solution to Problem B3
The answer is
for . These work by taking
.
Now to see these are the only ones, consider an arithmetic matrix
which is not zero everywhere. Its characteristic polynomial is , with discriminant
, so it has two distinct real roots; moreover, since
either one of the roots is zero or they are of opposite signs.
Now we can diagonalize by writing
where . By using the fact the diagonal entries have sum equalling the off-diagonal entries, we obtain that
Now if too then the same calculation gives
Let (since
). We appropriately get
and odd. If
we get
and if
we get
, which gives the curve of solutions that we claimed. (Unfortunately, during the test I neglected to address
, which probably means I will get null marks.)
9. Solution to Problem B4
By the Ravi substitution,
No idea why this was B4; it was by far the easiest problem on the test for me. I knew how to do it in less than a second on seeing it and the rest was just arithmetic. (We use the Ravi substitution all the time on olympiad inequalities, so it’s practically a reflex for me.)
10. Solution to Problem B5
My solution was long and disgusting, so I won’t write out the full details. The idea is to let be the number of permutations in
with the additional property that
. By casework on the index
with
(which must be surrounded by
or
if
) one obtains
Also by more casework one obtains the recursion
From this one obtains
So we know and can compute
so a long algebraic computation gives that these differ by
.
Also, I swear I’ve seen the exact condition many years ago, back when I was doing high school olympiads. But it was so long ago I don’t remember the source.
I solved 9 questions…
LikeLike